Leveraging AI
Our proprietary AI tools resolve the tension between speed and quality, empowering our world-class researchers to deliver faster and also deeper insights.
How we work

Data is only useful if it inspires compelling insights and actions. We use multiple tools to help our clients move seamlessly from data to insight and action.

Features

Build A Program

Pricing

Resources

Sign In

EmpytMenuItem

asd

Solutions

Case Studies

How a pharma company leveraged MaxDiff to identify which claims would drive trials

How a pharma company leveraged MaxDiff to identify which claims would drive trials
Through Upsiide and exploring the competitive landscape, research identified which claim (of many) had the greatest potential to drive purchase interest.
person holding a medicine package

Challenge

The challenge presented to research was to identify which one or two claims of many had the greatest potential to drive purchase interest.   

Solution

We worked with the client to perform claims testing via Upsiide, exploring the competitive landscape at the same time.

Impact

Results revealed that the current claim was, in fact, the strongest performing, so no changes were made to on-pack claims.

The client is a multinational pharmaceutical and life sciences company. 

The Client & Challenge

The client is a multinational pharmaceutical and life sciences company. 

In an effort to promote trial of the product in question, a number of potential claims were identified that could be made on pack.  The challenge presented to research was to identify which one or two claims had the greatest potential to drive purchase interest.   

The Solution

Claims testing was completed as a part of a broader initiative in which the competitive landscape was explored and key motivations / barriers to brand purchase were identified.  Research was conducted among a robust sample of n=1,000 current and prospective consumers.  From project initiation to final results was approximately 5 weeks. 

The Outcome

Results revealed that the current claim was, in fact, the strongest performing.  Alternative claims tested failed to garner similar levels of preference.  Further to this TURF analysis showed that the addition of a second claim to pack failed to expand reach achieved by the current.  As a result, no changes were made to claims made on pack.  

Related Posts

Whether you’ve got a specific project in mind, or you’d like to learn more – we’d love to hear from you.